Re: cpp in OS X, information needed

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 01:28:28PM +0000, Julio Merino wrote:
> Well, yes and no.  If we change the default conditionally, we add
> complexity for no real gain (unless someone steps up and tests that
> things still work in ancient versions).  Plus, if we are going to use
> this change to fix libtool (instead of my workaround in f2c), we'd be
> leaving out old OS X versions broken anyway, thus only fixing part of
> the problem.

Indepent of everything else, f2c should call the preprocessor in a way
that works. I think using "gcc -x c -E" is preferable for GCC...

Joerg