tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Licence handling: next steps

Joerg Sonnenberger <> writes:

> I don't like this syntax. Can we please make it
> (a) explicit
> (b) support ()
> (c) Spell them out instead of using weired symbols?

It didn't bother me that much, but Joerg's points are excellent.

> Given that we likely want to bump the required pkg_install, I am more
> than willing to add corresponding evaluation support to pkg_admin.
> It is needed for handling in pkg_add anyway.

If source building can use pkg_admin to eval the expressions using the
same code as pkg_add, and it appears soonish, that's a huge win.

Attachment: pgpLOah4FhVOo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index