Re: suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch

To: Ignatios Souvatzis <is%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:35:52 -0600 (CST)

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

> we have one-patch-per-file as a rule - what about multiple unrelated 
> patches to the same (set of) files? Duplicate the comments?

Duplicate the comments as needed with some minimum comments appropriate 
for the patch. That way if one patch is merged upstream and removed from 
pkgsrc remaining pkgsrc patch comments will make sense to pkgsrc 
maintainers.

References:
- suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch
  - From: Thomas Klausner
- Re: suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch
  - From: Ignatios Souvatzis

Prev by Date: One patch per file ? (was Re: suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch)
Next by Date: daily pkgsrc CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: One patch per file ? (was Re: suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch)
Next by Thread: Re: suggested pkglint change: error on missing comment for patch
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index