Re: Options vs. Binary packages

["Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>]

> Yes. We should never have an available package require unavailable 
> dependency.

Looking again, I see I forgot mplayer is still restricted.

Nevertheless, may I still commit the following?

> May I commit this patch for mplayer? (I did this yesterday.)
> 
> It has been noted many times that the codecs included are good enough.
> 
> Index: mplayer-share/options.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/pkgsrc/multimedia/mplayer-share/options.mk,v
> retrieving revision 1.33
> diff -u -r1.33 options.mk
> --- mplayer-share/options.mk  9 Sep 2008 01:11:53 -0000       1.33
> +++ mplayer-share/options.mk  18 Sep 2008 16:11:12 -0000
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
>  PKG_SUPPORTED_OPTIONS+= mplayer-runtime-cpudetection
>  .endif
>  .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386"
> -PKG_SUPPORTED_OPTIONS+= mplayer-default-cflags mplayer-win32
> +PKG_SUPPORTED_OPTIONS+= mplayer-default-cflags
>  .endif
>  .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "i386" || ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "powerpc" || \
>      ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha"
> 
> Also I will bump PKGREVISION for gmplayer, mencoder, mplayer and 
> mplayer-share. Do those sound correct?
> 
> 
> 

  Jeremy C. Reed