tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Options vs. Binary packages

To: tech-pkg%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:26:35 +0200

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:17:52AM -0500, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> Yes. We should never have an available package require unavailable 
> dependency.
> 
> May I commit this patch for mplayer? (I did this yesterday.)
> 
> It has been noted many times that the codecs included are good enough.

What does it give? mplayer remains undistributable...

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Jeremy C. Reed

References:
- Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Dennis den Brok
- Re: Options vs. Binary packages
  - From: Jeremy C. Reed

Prev by Date: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Next by Date: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Previous by Thread: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Next by Thread: Re: Options vs. Binary packages
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index