tech-pkg archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg_summary(5) and license restrictions

In article <> Joerg wrote:
: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 05:18:25PM +0300, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
: > Unfortunately a few important fields are absent in pkg_summary(5):

: I don't think they should be included in the pkg_summary.


: Actually, those should be attributes of the license and nothing else.

  Yes, they should be set according to the license.  Are you arguing
for the removal of these variables?  If so, I strongly object: they
are a simple anser to a decision distributors of binary pacakges have
to make (can I include them in the collection).

  Currently, they are set by hand.  When this came up in the past and
I suggested the value be stored with the license and set by the pkgsrc
infrastructure, it was argued that that was not worthwhile since very
few non-free licenses are used by more than one package (or a group of
packages sharing a Makefile.common).


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index