Re: -nox11, -x11, -qt, -tty, etc.

[Dieter Baron <dillo%KD119105101110.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp@localhost>]

In article <20080410183122.GA648%britannica.bec.de@localhost> Joerg wrote:
: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:49:25PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
: > That sounds like good incremental progress, and I think you should go
: > ahead and do it.  Perhaps the ultimate solution will be something that
: > feels like a config file with lines like:
: > 
: >   build foo with option bar, call it foo-bar
: > 
: > instead of the whole Makefile.

  No, the ultimate solution is not to require more than one package
directory, but instead build multiple binary packages from one
directory.

: I said it a long time ago, but for binary packages the following
: approach can be used with pbulk easily:

: PKG_OPTION_SETS= set1 set2

: PKG_OPTIONS_SET.set1= foo -bar
: PKGNAME_EXT.set1=
: PKG_OPTIONS_SET.set2= bar
: PKGNAME_EXT.set2=       bar

: and a corresponding entry in mk/pbulk + magic to include PKGNAME_EXT in
: the right place.

  And as I said a long time ago, that is not sufficient: pkg and
pkg-bar should conflict with each other.  Who handles that magic?

                                        yours,
                                        dillo