Re: USE_FEATURES: static library vs. "inplace" hack

[Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>]

 >> Several months ago USE_FEATURES framework were introduced.
 >> I think idea is cool. API is easy. But I still don't understand why
 >> libnbcompat library should be built again and again
 >> instead of building a static library once.
 >> That is why "inplace" method was implemented instead of
 >> linking with statically linked library built and installed once.

> I am working on a somewhat different scheme. Building the whole static
> compat library and linking every binary in the package with it is too
> crude.
I still don't understand why. Can you explain?  AFAIK linker will not
include unused object files into resulting executable.
Do you mean libraries?

And yes, support for PIC objects is needed.

-- 
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.