Re: Support for 240/4 and 0/8 addresses in NetBSD

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> writes:

>> I'd like to understand if this is actually headed for standards
>> track,
>
> This looks to me less like something for which standardization per se
> is relevant and more like a change in address allocation policy.  Thus,
> is "standards track" even an applicable concept?  (Maybe it is.  I'm no
> authority on this.  I'm just remarking on how it looks to me.)

Address allocation policy is about allocating addresses from ranges
defined by standards as available for allocation.   This is about
changing the definition of what is available, which is a standards
activity.