tech-net archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: npf 'bpf.jit' errors out?

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:08:21 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> Unsure if it applies to -7, but basically you have probably set a secure
> level so that modules cannot be loaded and npfctl see's no permission
> rather than it already exists.

I don't want to load any kernel modules, and after

     options BPFJIT
     options SLJIT

I shouldn't have to, or should I? Does the cone resulting from *JIT 
require module majjic?

securelevel is 1 - I thought about upping it, but haven't, yet.


     The ASCII Ribbon Campaign                    Hauke Fath
()     No HTML/RTF in email            Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
/\     No Word docs in email                     TU Darmstadt
     Respect for open standards              Ruf +49-6151-16-21344

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index