Re: mbuf flags

To: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: mbuf flags
From: Darren Reed <darrenr%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 01:34:30 +1000

On 11/07/2013 12:36 AM, Matt Thomas wrote:
> On Jul 9, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Robert Swindells <rjs%fdy2.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
>
>> Is there a pattern to follow when adding a new mbuf flag ?
>>
>> The M_LINKn ones fill up to the end of a nibble boundary so I would need
>> to modify every line if we wanted to keep all the hex values the same
>> width.
> What do you need a new mbuf flag for?

Improvements in npf of course.

References:
- mbuf flags
  - From: Robert Swindells
- Re: mbuf flags
  - From: Matt Thomas

Prev by Date: Re: Static interface routes for IP address on different subnet doesn't send an ARP who-has
Next by Date: IPv6 DAD stuck on a sk(4) interface
Previous by Thread: Re: mbuf flags
Next by Thread: mbuf flags
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index