On 28.09.2019 09:01, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 08:50:55PM +0200, Rhialto wrote: >> I have been pondering it for a while and it seems more complicated than >> I first thought... it seems that the actual value of delta isn't even >> important, but what rnd_delta_estimate() makes of it. > > There is also the question whether it would be best to just disable > ubsan here and restore the original solution. It seems to be there was > no real problem initially and we are fighting details of a workaround for > a false positive. > > Martin > Not really, I think the panic would be probably triggered in KASSERT(9) later. Even if not it is just close to it, this corner-case looks like handled wrongly.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature