Re: pulse-per-second API status

[Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>]

On Nov 1, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:

>>> Also, see below - 1ms strikes me as pretty bad for PPS.
>> Sure, but it's vastly better than nmea timecode, which is what the
>> other choice is.
> 
> Oh, sure; as I said in other words upthread, I'm not arguing that it's
> not a good choice for you - I'm arguing that it's not a good choice for
> the main tree.

I'm thinking of a middle ground.  Maybe only make it enabled
if you enabled a sysctl variable.

sysctl -w hw.ucom0.enable_pps=1

That way you have to explicit enable and have it documented
in the ucom man page about its problems.