Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/atari/stand/installboot

[Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>]

>    I'd like to hear your answer of my dumb question:
>    http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2014/11/16/msg007354.html
> 
> `Then why don't you guys also complain to fix existing abcksum()
> function which is called at the suggested memcpy?'
> 
> I didn't see it before.  The existing abcksum violates strict-aliasing
> too.  That's why I suggested taking your suggestion of falling back to
> -fno-strict-aliasing until someone is willing to turn it back on and
> go through all the code to make it safe, or rototill the whole thing
> into MI installboot.

Christos said "it is legally converting a void * pointer."
 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes-d/2014/11/16/msg007356.html
You guys have different opinions.  Which is correct?

Which C99 specification you think the existing abcksum violates?

---
Izumi Tsutsui