| Time | Subject | # followups | From |
|---|
| Thu, 31 Mar 2011 |
| 07:15 |
Re: Sparc memory, SBUS NICs, NVRAMS avail' from Po |
(0) |
chase rayfield |
| Wed, 30 Mar 2011 |
| 07:46 |
Sparc memory, NICs, NVRAMS, few additional notes |
(0) |
Ted Havelka |
| Tue, 29 Mar 2011 |
| 22:24 |
Re: Sparc memory, SBUS NICs, NVRAMS avail' from Po |
(0) |
..I'd rather be coding ASM! |
| 22:09 |
Sparc memory, SBUS NICs, NVRAMS avail' from Portla |
(2) |
Ted Havelka |
| Fri, 11 Mar 2011 |
| 23:32 |
Re: netbsd-5 branch now considered mostly stable f |
(0) |
Michael |
| 22:51 |
Re: netbsd-5 branch now considered mostly stable f |
(1) |
George Harvey |
| 07:14 |
re: netbsd-5 branch now considered mostly stable f |
(1) |
matthew green |
| 00:01 |
Re: netbsd-5 branch now considered mostly stable f |
(1) |
George Harvey |
| Wed, 09 Mar 2011 |
| 18:22 |
netbsd-5 branch now considered mostly stable for S |
(1) |
matthew green |
| Sat, 05 Mar 2011 |
| 20:42 |
Re: qemu success with -current |
(0) |
Manuel Bouyer |
| 14:12 |
Re: qemu success with -current |
(1) |
Antti Kantee |
| Wed, 02 Mar 2011 |
| 13:38 |
Hi |
(0) |
kusk |
| 11:56 |
re: qemu success with -current |
(0) |
matthew green |
| 09:20 |
Re: qemu success with -current |
(1) |
Artyom Tarasenko |