Re: Multiboot header license change

[Andrew Smallshaw <andrews%sdf.lonestar.org@localhost>]

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 08:56:46PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> 
> Just to be crystal-clear about this, the NetBSD bootblocks and kernel
> contain a complete Multiboot implementation which has never had any GPL
> code in it.

Sorry, I'm a bit tardy responding to this - I don't keep as close
an eye on this list as I might.  Does this mean GRUB can be dropped
in in place of the NetBSD bootlocks and it should work?  

I'm thinking that provides a fresh workaround for the long-standing
bug on VIA ITX systems.  The old advice (use an old bootloader) is
getting trickier a it gets more and more outdated.  I know I had
plenty of issues getting this 5.0 system installed - from memory I
needed the bootblocks from 1.6 and the installer from 4.0 to install
5.0...

-- 
Andrew Smallshaw
andrews%sdf.lonestar.org@localhost