Port-amiga archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: disklabel
Hume Smith wrote:
> - so: why *is* there a disklabel command in NetBSD/Amiga at all, never
> mind a different from the one you compile from src10? - why do the
> manpages talk about having to disklabel?
There is a purpose for disklabel even though it might not be usefull to
hard drive and partitions on them: You can generate fileimages and use
them with /dev/vnd0 (see man vnconfig), you might use disklabel to
partition them - because you are unable to partition them with HdToolBox...
The main reason might simply be lazyness of course - why remove a binary
from the Amiga distribution tree if it might be usefull - if only for
error-messages.
> - why does newfs make complaints hinting it wants disklabels, and can't
> write its own, etc.?
Newfs does use disklabel - those which are sitting in the RAM created by
the kernel. The IO-Routine to write disklabels has been removed, thats
all. A future version might be able to write them - and write a new RDB as
well!
> there've been grumbings in newgroups lately that NetBSD isn't as easy to
> admin as linux; i never guessed the docs and software load were actually
> conspiring *against* me. that was frigging dangerous - in all the
> diddling with disklabel, i slipped once and wrecked the partition scheme
> on my main drive. (miraculously, i only had to restore data in the
> Amiga partitions.)
Same can happen for any Unix.
--
Markus Illenseer
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index