Re: lang/rust with gcc10 (Re: diff from 2025-05-14 03:12 to 2025-05-17 10:36

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Makoto Fujiwara <makoto%if.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp@localhost> writes:

> If we add gcc-10, lang/rust packaged fine on
> NetBSD/amd64 9.4
>
> May I commit ?

Almost always, that is wrong, because the requirement is some c++ std,
not gcc10 itself.   I would not want to see this committed unless
there's a link to evidence that there's some bug in gcc affecting <=9
and fixed in 10.

If it's "need c++17" then say that.

The real question is what the real requirement is.