pkgsrc-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: gcc10 with Ada support added to wip

For debugging pkgsrc problems, "make ... PKG_DEBUG_LEVEL=1" will narrow down where things are going awry (I find this more informative than the make debug options)

For problems in the patch stage, "make PATCH_DEBUG=yes" should show which patch file is problematic (although I suspect that's not the problem here?).

I have the PATCH_DEBUG setting in my mk.conf, so it gets run automatically.

On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 at 07:33, Chavdar Ivanov <> wrote:
On Sat, 6 Nov 2021 at 13:39, Fernando Oleo Blanco <> wrote:
> Am Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:37:33 +0000
> schrieb "Chavdar Ivanov" <>:
> > The difference between 9.2 and -current has grown up quite a bit, I'd
> > say. I've had a few other occasions when stuff was reluctant to work
> > under -current and had to be frogmarched somehow. If one is running
> > rolling pkgsrc (pkg_rolling-replace every ten days or so) on a
> > -current system (updated daily), one is expecting things to break from
> > time to time. All in all, my NetBSD systems have been remarkably
> > well-behaved.
> >
> > >
> > > P.S: did you 'make clean' between option changes? I have had 'make
> > > patch' fail if it had already patched the system.
> >
> > Yes, every attempt started with 'make clean'. The 'make patch'
> > failures were always due to not being able to locate the target file
> > to patch.
> >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Fer
> > >
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Chavdar
> >
> > --
> > ----
> I come with good news and bad news... Good news is that it works in
> NetBSD-current. It was built successfully by racoon on 9.99.92 and me
> just today.
> I suppose racoon built it in a sandbox. I built it in a clean install
> that I just did, so equivalent to a sandbox.
> So... I do not know what is wrong with your setup. gcc6-aux should not
> require ISL, since it is not being configured for it and it is not
> pulling it as a dependency. And your gcc10-aux was failing in libgcc...
> Which is not something that I have touched at all...
> If you could send me the make logs, I could take a closer look. But
> with the issues that you have been having, I would say that you have
> some flag, environment, system or variable configured in a way that
> makes gcc6-aux/gcc10-aux break. I am not saying it is intentional. If
> you have been rocking -current for a while, I suppose that after some
> updates and changes, something is bound to change in an unexpected way.
> I am currently running 'make test' to see if there are any differences
> with NetBSD-9.2.

I think I located the problem - what fails for me is actually 'make
patch'. Here is an excerpt from the output of 'make -d all patch' :

           test -n "" -a -d /wip/gcc10-aux; then  echo 1>&2 "ERROR:"
 echo 1>&2 "ERROR:";
 echo 1>&2 "ERROR:" "Some of the selected build options and/or local
patches may be incompatible.";  echo 1>&2 "ERROR:" "Please try
building with fewer options or patches.";  echo 1>&2 "ERROR:";
                                              echo 1>&2 "ERROR:"
 fi; exit 1;                                   fi
No such line 2320 in input file, ignoring

For whatever reason it doesn't prepend /usr/pkgsrc , the patch fails
and it then  ignores ... Obviously if none of the patches have taken
place the build should fail.

I'll trim my /etc/mk.conf and try again.

> Regards,
> Fer


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index