Re: no emacs/X binary packages considered bad, and worse than emacs with svg

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost> writes:

> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 12:10:05AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:50:54PM +0000, maya%NetBSD.org@localhost wrote:
>> > This is a violent hack, but rust builds are going to be a lot less flaky
>> > on pkgbuild if we introduce
>> > 
>> > MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=no
>> > 
>> > to all Rust using things, on netbsd only.
>> 
>> Actually, rust did build on i386 but not amd64, and I don't know
>> why; there's no rust directory left in bulklog. I guess one dependancy is
>> failing, but I don't know how to find this.
>
> It did build:
> [745/20283] Starting build of  rust-1.35.0nb1
> [745/20283] Successfully built rust-1.35.0nb1
>
> And emacs too:
> [1173/20283] Starting build of  emacs26-26.2
> [1173/20283] Successfully built emacs26-26.2

Did you change the config of /dev/random, or something about rust's use
of /dev/random?