Mayuresh <mayuresh%acm.org@localhost> writes: > I installed the dep manually and it resolved the issue. > > Request to patch the dep accordingly. [some offlist discussion, suggesting to read the guide and produce a patch, which Mayuresh sent me off-list] --- a/print/tex-xcolor/Makefile +++ b/print/tex-xcolor/Makefile @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ COMMENT= Driver-independent color extensions for LaTeX and pdfLaTeX LICENSE= lppl-1.2 DEPENDS+= tex-graphics-cfg-[0-9]*:../../print/tex-graphics-cfg +DEPENDS+= tex-colortbl-[0-9]*:../../print/tex-colortbl .include "../../print/texlive/package.mk" .include "../../mk/bsd.pkg.mk" This seems reasonable to me. Before I commit it, I'd like to hear from some tex people, specifically: is there a place where these tex modules (upstream) declare their dependencies? Is colortbl listed for xcolor? It seems this package builds without the new line, but then if you use certain things it fails. I don't know if we include all packages as dependencies if they are \Required by any installed file, or something elee? any other reason this is trickier than it seems?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature