Am Tue, 5 Aug 2014 08:33:57 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>: > I'm not sure how common this is (it's not the case on SunOS), but if > it turns out that not adding rpaths is the default on most systems > then yes we should probably look at adding them in pkgsrc. I had a discussion here about this and one major argument against adding rpath to the GCC specs is that this breaks any attempt to use LD_RUN_PATH. This is stupid design --- rpath should work in addition to the environment variable, not replace it, but this is how it works. Some users (our users are also users of the compilers we install) may have heard of LD_RUN_PATH and would wonder what is wrong with our installation. At least I'd assume a major part of separate GCC installs in the wild not having built-in rpath, as this is what you get by default without hacking the spec file. Alrighty then, Thomas -- Dr. Thomas Orgis Universität Hamburg RRZ / Zentrale Dienste / HPC Schlüterstr. 70 20146 Hamburg Tel.: 040/42838 8826 Fax: 040/428 38 6270
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature