pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/52241 (graphics/netpbm does not compile on Solaris 10)
The following reply was made to PR pkg/52241; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost>
To: Joern Clausen <joern.clausen%uni-bielefeld.de@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, adam%NetBSD.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost,
gnats-admin%NetBSD.org@localhost, dholland%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/52241 (graphics/netpbm does not compile on Solaris 10)
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:35:07 +0000
* On 2018-02-21 at 14:27 GMT, Joern Clausen wrote:
> > Is that sufficient?
>
> Yes and no...
>
> buildtools/stamp-date is now executed, but the generated file "compile.h"
> contains
>
> #define BUILD_DATETIME %s
>
> because Solaris-10's "date" (or strftime, to be precise) does not know about
> "%s". This breaks compilation of libpm.c.
>
> I'm pretty sure that when I opened the PR, replacing the shell was the only
> fix necessary. Either BUILD_DATETIME wasn't there, or someone changed the
> format definition? Judging from the use of BUILD_DATETIME in libpm.c,
> anything else than a numeral should not work. I personally would prefer
>
> date +%Y%m%d%H%M%S
>
> as it is more readable anyway. Using gdate is probably the easier fix in
> pkgsrc, though.
The better fix would be to remove it completely so that we move one
step closer to reproducible builds.
--
Jonathan Perkin - Joyent, Inc. - www.joyent.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index