Re: pkg/48238: mail/mutt-devel needs xsltproc

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/48238; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: NetBSD bugtracking <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/48238: mail/mutt-devel needs xsltproc
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:39:29 +0200

 On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 07:25:00PM +0000, Jörn Clausen wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/48238; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Clausen?= <joernc%googlemail.com@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 > pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 >      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_C=2E?= <joern.clausen%uni-bielefeld.de@localhost>
 > Subject: Re: pkg/48238: mail/mutt-devel needs xsltproc
 > Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:20:25 +0200
 > 
 >  On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Thomas Klausner <wiz%netbsd.org@localhost> 
 > wrote:
 >  >  Well, not always, otherwise it would have failed for more people
 >  >  already.
 >  
 >  How many people do you expect to still use mutt???
 
 Myself?
 All the bulk builds build it.
 
 >  >  Timestamp issue in the tarball?
 >  
 >  Unlikely. The tarball is from 2010, and I have built this package
 >  several times on different platforms. I guess I had always xsltproc
 >  installed in advance by chance.
 
 Here are the only places in the Makefiles where I can find mention of
 xsltproc (doc/Makefile*). Please check which of the files is newer
 than manual.html.
 
 manual.html: $(srcdir)/html.xsl $(srcdir)/mutt.xsl stamp-doc-xml 
$(srcdir)/mutt.css
         -xsltproc --nonet -o $@ $(srcdir)/html.xsl manual.xml
 
 stamp-doc-chunked: $(srcdir)/chunk.xsl $(srcdir)/mutt.xsl stamp-doc-xml 
$(srcdir)/mutt.css
         -xsltproc --nonet $(srcdir)/chunk.xsl manual.xml
         touch stamp-doc-chunked
 
  Thomas