Re: pkg/44216 (mail/postfix requires NIS which does not exist on Solaris builds over b130)

[Tim Zingelman <zingelman%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/44216; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Tim Zingelman <zingelman%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: solaris-pkg-people%netbsd.org@localhost, pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, 
        pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, 
hauke%netbsd.org@localhost, 
        bda%mirrorshades.net@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/44216 (mail/postfix requires NIS which does not exist on
 Solaris builds over b130)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:21:56 -0600

 > Synopsis: mail/postfix requires NIS which does not exist on Solaris builds 
 > over b130
 
 Just to be clear... the only part of the included patch that is new is
 the final segment, right:
 
  @@ -400,8 +415,8 @@
   #define HAS_DBM
   #define DEF_DB_TYPE    "dbm"
   #define ALIAS_DB_MAP   "dbm:/etc/mail/aliases"
  -#define HAS_NIS
  -#define HAS_NISPLUS
  +/* #define HAS_NIS
  +#define HAS_NISPLUS */
   #define USE_SYS_SOCKIO_H               /* Solaris 2.5, changed sys/ioctl.h */
   #define GETTIMEOFDAY(t)        gettimeofday(t)
   #define ROOT_PATH      "/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/ucb"
 
 The rest is the pre-existing patch-ag file.
 
 It seems to me that this fix should be wrapped in a version check of
 some sort, since builds <= b130 have NIS, right?
 
 I work with 'closed' Solaris 10, so I'm fuzzy on what variable one
 might look at to determine a Solaris/ONNV build number.
 
 Any ideas?  Thanks,  - Tim