Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3

[wen heping <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/43227; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: wen heping <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 11:20:09 +0800

 On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, OBATA Akio <obache%netbsd.org@localhost> 
wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/43227; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
 > Cc:
 > Subject: Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
 > Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 11:40:09 +0900
 >
 > =A0On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:50:04 +0900, wen heping 
 > <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost> w=
 rote:
 >
 > =A0> =A0> Please keep patch file name.
 > =A0> =A0> Your new patch-ab should be patch-aa.
 > =A0> If I deleted previous pathc-aa, and create a new patch,
 > =A0> =A0then the new patch's name should be patch-aa but not patch-ab ?
 >
 > =A0Yes.
 > =A0But your deleted patch-aa is for rpy_tools.py, and new patch-ab is
 > =A0also for rpy_tools.py, so you should update patch-aa to adapt source c=
 hanges.
 >
 > =A0> =A0> And why patch-ac is required?
 > =A0> Without patch-ac, the build will fail.
 >
 > =A0Is it came from API changes of R?
 
 I think it is not the R API changes, but the include file of rpy changed.
 
 
 >
 > =A0> =A0>
 > =A0> =A0> > Important: the patch below is based on R-2.11.0, if you use R=
 -2.10.1=3D
 > =A0> =A0, please modify the PLIST file with s/2110/2101.
 > =A0> =A0>
 > =A0> =A0> Need following too?
 > =A0> =A0> -BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.R+=3D R>=3D2.7.0
 > =A0> =A0> +BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.R+=3D R>=3D2.11.0
 > =A0> Actualy, rpy-1.0.3 could build with R-2.8 2.9 2.10 and 2.11,
 > =A0> =A0if build with current R-2.10.1, then the PLIST will include r2101=
 .so,
 > =A0> =A0if with R-2.11.0, the r2110.so
 >
 > =A0In other words, if you built rpy with R-2.10.1, is it also usable
 > =A0with R-2.11.0?
 
 No, when rpy build with R-2.10.1, it will install file r2101.so to the
 target directory,
 while with R-2.11.0(which I send a PR to update it), it will install r2110.=
 so
 
 
 
 
 
 >
 > =A0> =A0> > -.include "../../math/py-Numeric/buildlink3.mk"
 > =A0> =A0> > +.include "../../math/py-numpy/buildlink3.mk"
 > =A0> =A0>
 > =A0> =A0> Where is it came from?
 > =A0> the source coder suggested use numpy instead py-Numeric,
 > =A0> =A0you know py-Numeric is depracted.
 >
 > =A0Thanks.
 >
 > =A0--
 > =A0OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >
 >