[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
The following reply was made to PR pkg/43227; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "OBATA Akio" <obache%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/43227: [math/py-rpy] Update to 1.0.3
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 11:40:09 +0900
On Sat, 01 May 2010 23:50:04 +0900, wen heping <wenheping%gmail.com@localhost>
> > Please keep patch file name.
> > Your new patch-ab should be patch-aa.
> If I deleted previous pathc-aa, and create a new patch,
> then the new patch's name should be patch-aa but not patch-ab ?
But your deleted patch-aa is for rpy_tools.py, and new patch-ab is
also for rpy_tools.py, so you should update patch-aa to adapt source changes.
> > And why patch-ac is required?
> Without patch-ac, the build will fail.
Is it came from API changes of R?
> > > Important: the patch below is based on R-2.11.0, if you use R-2.10.1=
> , please modify the PLIST file with s/2110/2101.
> > Need following too?
> > -BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.R+= R>=2.7.0
> > +BUILDLINK_API_DEPENDS.R+= R>=2.11.0
> Actualy, rpy-1.0.3 could build with R-2.8 2.9 2.10 and 2.11,
> if build with current R-2.10.1, then the PLIST will include r2101.so,
> if with R-2.11.0, the r2110.so
In other words, if you built rpy with R-2.10.1, is it also usable
> > > -.include "../../math/py-Numeric/buildlink3.mk"
> > > +.include "../../math/py-numpy/buildlink3.mk"
> > Where is it came from?
> the source coder suggested use numpy instead py-Numeric,
> you know py-Numeric is depracted.
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |