Re: pkg/40153 (pkgsrc/devel/binutils fails to build on solaris 10 sparc)

[David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/40153; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: solaris-pkg-people%NetBSD.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
        pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, zingelman%fnal.gov@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/40153 (pkgsrc/devel/binutils fails to build on solaris 10
        sparc)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 05:03:05 +0000

 On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 03:15:05AM +0000, Tim Zingelman wrote:
  >  > =A0Does adding
  >  >
  >  > =A0 =A0.include "../../devel/gettext-lib/buildlink3.mk"
  >  >
  >  > =A0to the package makefile solve the problem?
  >  
  >  No change.
 
 ah well, guess it wasn't likely to be that easy.
 
  >  I think the problem may be that the compile 'sees' the pkgsrc include
  >  files but then links against the builtin libintl.
  >  If I add -L/usr/pkg/lib -lintl to the end of the failing link
  >  manually, it links ok.
  >  
  >  I see the compile line for size.o includes:
  > -I.././binutils/../intl -I../intl even when compiled without the
  > added: CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --with-included-gettext so maybe the
  > bad include file is found there?
 
 Could be.
 
 Does explicit --without-included-gettext change that?
 
 Looking in config.log (this being binutils there will probably be
 several of them) to see what it's thinking about libintl may be
 helpful also.
 
 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland%netbsd.org@localhost