Re: pkg/39788: graphviz on AIX

[John Ellson <ellson%research.att.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/39788; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Ellson <ellson%research.att.com@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/39788: graphviz on AIX
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:11:10 -0500

 Jens Rehsack wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/39788; it has been noted by GNATS.
 >
 > From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack%web.de@localhost>
 > To: John Ellson <ellson%research.att.com@localhost>
 > Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/39788: graphviz on AIX
 > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:33:59 +0000
 >
 >  > Jens Rehsack wrote:
 >  > > The following reply was made to PR pkg/39788; it has been noted by 
 > GNATS.
 >  > >
 >  > > From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack%web.de@localhost>
 >  > > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 >  > > Cc: 
 >  > > Subject: Re: pkg/39788: graphviz on AIX
 >  > > Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 22:42:18 +0000
 >  > >
 >  > >  Hi,
 >  > >  
 >  > >  maybe PR pkg/40180 helps out the problem with the old pkg.
 >  > >  Would be great if John Ellson could try the patch, too.
 >  > >  
 >  > >  It compiles on AIX using PKG_OPTIONS.graphviz= -x11 -pangocairo -lua 
 > -tcl 
 >  > >  (IIRC).
 >  > >  
 >  > >  Best regards,
 >  > >  Jens
 >  >
 >  > Jens,
 >  
 >  Hi John,
 >  
 >  > Could you send (or resend) a copy of this patch please?   I probably 
 >  > missed it, or lost it.
 >  
 >  The patch could be found in PR pkg/40180 
 >  (http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=40180). I didn't 
 >  attach it to the follow-up of pkg/39788.
 >  
 >  > Thanks. 
 >  >
 >  > John
 >  
 >  Best regards,
 >  Jens
 >  
 >  
 >   
 Jens, thanks, but I really don't know what to do with this patch?  It 
 seems to be largely diffs of generated files between two releases,
 or NetBSD packaging changes to files that don't come from upstream?
 
 e.g,  
 
        -DISTNAME=      graphviz-2.16.1
        -PKGREVISION=   4
        +DISTNAME=      graphviz-2.20.3
 
 Is there any chance you could produce a diff between upstream CVS 
 sources and your latest patched code, just for those changes that we 
 should be taking back?
 e.g. changes to configure.ac or Makefile.am, but not those to config.h, 
 or Makefile.in or Makefile, or to any of those NetBSDs packaging or 
 patches/* files?
 
 I see some changes to configure.ac, but AFAICT these are our upstream 
 changes between 2.16 and 2.20?  I can't tell if there is something new 
 in there.
 
 
 Thanks
 
 John