pkgsrc-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?

To: Cem Kayali <cemkayali%eticaret.com.tr@localhost>
Subject: Re: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 19:10:57 +0100

On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 07:51:36AM -0800, Cem Kayali wrote:
> I do wonder why there is no variable (ie; ACCAPTABLE_SOURCE=non-OSS) or a
> subcategory, a notice stating that a pkgrsc software is OSS (Open Source
> Software) or non-OSS. Is this something not-compatible with NetBSD look?

All non-OSS licenses have to be explicitly accepted if you want to build
them.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
  - From: Cem Kayali

References:
- Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
  - From: Cem Kayali

Prev by Date: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
Next by Date: Re: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
Previous by Thread: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
Next by Thread: Re: Why there is no OSS and non-OSS notice in pkgsrc packages?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index