NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?

To: Marc Baudoin <babafou%babafou.eu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
From: Ben Collver <bencollver%riseup.net@localhost>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2026 10:05:04 -0700

On Fri, Jun 26, 2026 at 07:55:20PM +0200, Marc Baudoin wrote:
> Aryabhata <bsdhexa%gmail.com@localhost> écrit :
> >
> > I'm sure some of you caught the recent news that QEMU is revising its
> > policy to start accepting AI/LLM-generated code.
> 
> Do you have some reference about that?

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2026-05/msg07614.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
  - From: Mario Marietto

References:
- QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
  - From: Aryabhata
- Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
  - From: Marc Baudoin

Prev by Date: Re: 2026Q1 x11/xephem segfaults amd64
Next by Date: Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
Previous by Thread: Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
Next by Thread: Re: QEMU accepting AI code - viable alternatives for NVMM (bhyve/vmm)?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index