NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt

To: netbsd-users <netbsd-users%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
From: Jan Schaumann <jschauma%netmeister.org@localhost>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 12:54:52 -0400

Mayuresh <mayuresh%acm.org@localhost> wrote:
> So, in short, if I don't own the alias domain, I can't sign dkim?

Correct - that is the point of DKIM.

-Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh

References:
- No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Jan Schaumann
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
  - From: Mayuresh

Prev by Date: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Next by Date: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Previous by Thread: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Next by Thread: Re: No dkim signature attached when using mutt
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index