Re: procfs difference between NetBSD and Linux

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 02:29:51PM -0000, Michael van Elst wrote:
> martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) writes:
> 
> >And any software requiring a procfs mount to work correctly is not portable
> >(for some sense of portable).
> 
> The bad behaviour is not restricted to procfs.

Yes, but Samba will require a mounted /proc procfs even after the
kernel fix. (I was kinda considering the original problem solved "soonish")

Martin