NetBSD-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Choice of desktops (Was: *PLEASE READ* Re: Two NetBSDs ...)



On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, markucz%gmail.com@localhost wrote:

        Then you will only benefit from some of the changes. If
        you are using a machine which not powerful enough to handle
        the gnome desktop (even a low end x86), then you would need
        to select a different desktop environment. Its quite likely
        the netbsd-desktop install option will only be available
        on i386 and amd64 initially, but quite a lot of the
        infrastructure changes will benefit anyone who chooses to
        install the relevant packages, no matter what arch.

Agree. I mean it'd be nice if the desktop is simple enough to be used on
other archs too (Alpha, MIPS, you name it). If the idea is to have a desktop
for people who need the job done, then probably they won't be from the x86
camp only.

Aside from that, I wouldn't choose Gnome for a very simple reason - it
depends on a damn lot of other packages. This deserves a separate thread, I
think.

        I would also prefer something lighter like xfce, but I'm
        not going to stand in the way of those interested in ensuring
        that a 'full fat' gnome desktop works well on NetBSD.  I'm
        sure it will be possible to adjust the initial netbsd-desktop
        installer to select an alternate desktop packages such as
        kde, xfce4 or even a lightweight window manager like jwm.


--
                David/absolute       -- www.NetBSD.org: No hype required --


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index