Re: misc/45038: lack of tests options

[Julio Merino <jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

On 6/16/11 10:24 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
> Julio,
>
> Is the `unprivileged-user' option description correct ?

Yup; see below.

> netbsd-testsman.diff
>
>
> Index: share/man/man7/tests.7
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/src/share/man/man7/tests.7,v
> retrieving revision 1.4
> diff -u -p -r1.4 tests.7
> --- share/man/man7/tests.7      7 Nov 2010 17:49:33 -0000       1.4
> +++ share/man/man7/tests.7      16 Jun 2011 21:08:04 -0000
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
>   .\" OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN
>   .\" IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
>   .\"
> -.Dd November 7, 2010
> +.Dd June 16, 2011
>   .Dt TESTS 7
>   .Os
>   .Sh NAME
> @@ -163,6 +163,20 @@ The suite-specific configuration file im
>   which contains properties shared among all test suites.
>   These files conform to the configuration file format described in
>   .Xr atf-formats 5 .
> +.Pp
> +The following configuration variables are available in the
> +.Nx
> +test suite :

The space before : is probably not desired.

> +.Bl -tag -width "unprivileged-user"
> +.It fstype
> +When set to a filesystem type, restrict tests programs from the
> +.Pa/usr/tests/fs/vfs/
> +tree to only run test cases for the given type.
> +.It unprivileged-user
> +This variable allows setting an unprivileged user login name to be used by
> +tests. Default to

"Defaults to".  Also, new sentence new line.

> +.Sq _atf .
> +.El
>   .Ss What to do if something fails?
>   If there is
>   .Em any failure

Thanks for doing this!

--
Julio Merino / @jmmv