Re: misc/45038: lack of tests options

[Julio Merino <jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR misc/45038; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Julio Merino <jmmv%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: Nicolas Joly <njoly%pasteur.fr@localhost>
Cc: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost, misc-bug-people%netbsd.org@localhost, 
 gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, netbsd-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost, 
yamt%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: misc/45038: lack of tests options
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:29:01 +0100

 On 6/16/11 10:24 PM, Nicolas Joly wrote:
 > Julio,
 >
 > Is the `unprivileged-user' option description correct ?
 
 Yup; see below.
 
 > netbsd-testsman.diff
 >
 >
 > Index: share/man/man7/tests.7
 > ===================================================================
 > RCS file: /cvsroot/src/share/man/man7/tests.7,v
 > retrieving revision 1.4
 > diff -u -p -r1.4 tests.7
 > --- share/man/man7/tests.7   7 Nov 2010 17:49:33 -0000       1.4
 > +++ share/man/man7/tests.7   16 Jun 2011 21:08:04 -0000
 > @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 >   .\" OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN
 >   .\" IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
 >   .\"
 > -.Dd November 7, 2010
 > +.Dd June 16, 2011
 >   .Dt TESTS 7
 >   .Os
 >   .Sh NAME
 > @@ -163,6 +163,20 @@ The suite-specific configuration file im
 >   which contains properties shared among all test suites.
 >   These files conform to the configuration file format described in
 >   .Xr atf-formats 5 .
 > +.Pp
 > +The following configuration variables are available in the
 > +.Nx
 > +test suite :
 
 The space before : is probably not desired.
 
 > +.Bl -tag -width "unprivileged-user"
 > +.It fstype
 > +When set to a filesystem type, restrict tests programs from the
 > +.Pa/usr/tests/fs/vfs/
 > +tree to only run test cases for the given type.
 > +.It unprivileged-user
 > +This variable allows setting an unprivileged user login name to be used by
 > +tests. Default to
 
 "Defaults to".  Also, new sentence new line.
 
 > +.Sq _atf .
 > +.El
 >   .Ss What to do if something fails?
 >   If there is
 >   .Em any failure
 
 Thanks for doing this!
 
 -- 
 Julio Merino / @jmmv