Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer

To: Lloyd Parkes <lloyd%must-have-coffee.gen.nz@localhost>
Subject: Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
From: Mayuresh <mayuresh%acm.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2022 08:05:02 +0530

On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 06:18:41AM +1300, Lloyd Parkes wrote:
> I used the second (non-BIOS) image because I guessed it might be a hybrid
> installer. I think that my old NUCs only support BIOS booting from USB
> sticks, but I could easily be wrong.

Ok. So, it appears the -bios image has become redundant now. Or hasn't it?

If yes, they may want to stop building it to preempt such confusion.

-- 
Mayuresh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
  - From: nia
- Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
  - From: Martin Husemann

References:
- 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
  - From: Lloyd Parkes
- Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
  - From: Mayuresh
- Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
  - From: Lloyd Parkes

Prev by Date: Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
Next by Date: daily CVS update output
Previous by Thread: Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
Next by Thread: Re: 10_BETA: Nice QOL improvements to the installer
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index