Re: Serious crashes on 9.99.93

[Yorick Hardy <yorickhardy%gmail.com@localhost>]

Dear pin,

On 2021-12-28, pin wrote:
> 
> 
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> 
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> 
> On Tuesday, December 28th, 2021 at 16:29, Yorick Hardy <yorickhardy%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> 
> > Dear pin,
> >
> > On 2021-12-27, pin wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I've upgraded my amd64 machine to NetBSD-9.99.93 yesterday and I'm experience serious crashes which were not happening on 9.99.92.
> > >
> > > dmesg, https://pastebin.com/8WJeUJDj
> > >
> > > Xorg-log, https://pastebin.com/xTAmUZPU
> > >
> > > The backtraces from the coredumps aren't really useful, https://pastebin.com/eaXYEC0Z
> > >
> > > I've managed to reproduce the crashes by launching lariza or badwolf web browsers.
> > >
> > > The system runs without issues if I don't use a web browser.
> > >
> > > Also, I've noticed the following while booting after a crash
> > >
> > > panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" failed: file "/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c", line 525
> > >
> > > Finally, unsure if related, console resolution doesn't scale after loading i915drmkms0, it used to in 9.99.92.
> > >
> > > Although, resolution after startx is correct.
> > >
> > > I've hosted the core-dumps in case,
> > >
> > > netbsd.2.core.gz, https://ufile.io/d00lfx4f
> > >
> > > netbsd.2.gz, https://ufile.io/4yvklq5w
> > >
> > > Thank you for any hints.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > pin
> > >
> > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
> >
> > Somehow I managed to get a backtrace (it seems to be correct):
> >
> > Crash version 9.99.82, image version 9.99.93.
> >
> > WARNING: versions differ, you may not be able to examine this image.
> >
> > crash: _kvm_kvatop(0)
> >
> > Kernel compiled without options LOCKDEBUG.
> >
> > System panicked: kernel diagnostic assertion "solocked2(so, so2)" failed: file "/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c", line 525
> >
> > Backtrace from time of crash is available.
> >
> > crash> bt
> >
> > _KERNEL_OPT_GENFB_GLYPHCACHE() at 0
> >
> > _KERNEL_OPT_GENFB_GLYPHCACHE() at 0
> >
> > sys_reboot() at sys_reboot
> >
> > vpanic() at vpanic+0x160
> >
> > __x86_indirect_thunk_rax() at __x86_indirect_thunk_rax
> >
> > unp_send() at unp_send+0xa15
> >
> > sosend() at sosend+0x845
> >
> > soo_write() at soo_write+0x2f
> >
> > do_filewritev.part.0() at do_filewritev.part.0+0x25d
> >
> > syscall() at syscall+0x196
> >
> > --- syscall (number 121) ---
> >
> > syscall+0x196:
> >
> > crash>
> >
> > the last change I could find which might be relevant was in sys/kern/sys_generic.c 1.133, but that
> >
> > was before 9.99.93, so I am not sure where to look.
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Yorick Hardy
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Was this change made in 9.99.92 after the 15th of December?
> 
> Until the above date this did not happen.
> 
> Regards

11 September, so: long before! But thanks, I will continue to look
for any changes after 15 December (I am sure someone more knowledgeable
will find it, but I will have a go in the mean time).

-- 
Kind regards,

Yorick Hardy