Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

["Perry E. Metzger" <perry%piermont.com@localhost>]

Juergen Hannken-Illjes <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>> is it possible what WAPBL and dump(8) aren't fully compatible? I've
>> noticed errors like this twice when attempting to "restore" a file
>> from a backup of file system mount with the logging option:
>> 
>> expected next file 55, got 54
>
> Just a guess: the log inode?  This is harmless as all you get is
> one  superfluous inode on the dump.
>
> We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.

Not just could, should...

-- 
Perry E. Metzger                perry%piermont.com@localhost