Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

Juergen Hannken-Illjes <> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>> is it possible what WAPBL and dump(8) aren't fully compatible? I've
>> noticed errors like this twice when attempting to "restore" a file
>> from a backup of file system mount with the logging option:
>> expected next file 55, got 54
> Just a guess: the log inode?  This is harmless as all you get is
> one  superfluous inode on the dump.
> We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.

Not just could, should...

Perry E. Metzger      

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index