Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

[Juergen Hannken-Illjes <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost>]

On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> 
>       Hello,
> 
> is it possible what WAPBL and dump(8) aren't fully compatible? I've
> noticed errors like this twice when attempting to "restore" a file
> from a backup of file system mount with the logging option:
> 
> expected next file 55, got 54

Just a guess: the log inode?  This is harmless as all you get is
one  superfluous inode on the dump.

We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.
-- 
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig 
(Germany)