Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: WAPBL vs. dump(8)

On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 01:13:54PM +0100, Matthias Scheler wrote:
>       Hello,
> is it possible what WAPBL and dump(8) aren't fully compatible? I've
> noticed errors like this twice when attempting to "restore" a file
> from a backup of file system mount with the logging option:
> expected next file 55, got 54

Just a guess: the log inode?  This is harmless as all you get is
one  superfluous inode on the dump.

We could of course teach dump to ignore SF_LOG inodes.
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - - TU Braunschweig 

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index