tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ctype, chrtbl, rune tables and POSIX2008
On Thu, 5 May 2011 23:44:54 +0200
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> The second part is the Linux/Darwin Thread Local Locale interface.
> Basically, this allows setting a locale for the current thread without
> modifying the global (fall back) locale. IMO this is just insane and
> repeating the mistakes of the original locale interface. I am strongly
> in favour of *not* implementing this.
I totally agree,
--
Matt
- References:
- ctype, chrtbl, rune tables and POSIX2008
- Re: ctype, chrtbl, rune tables and POSIX2008
- Re: ctype, chrtbl, rune tables and POSIX2008
- Re: ctype, chrtbl, rune tables and POSIX2008
- Re: ctype, chrtbl, rune tables and POSIX2008
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index