tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: cp -n diff

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: cp -n diff
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 08:15:56 +0000

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:53:06AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
 > So, if -n is to be rejected from cp, which I think it should be, then
 > -l should be removed as well, it hasn't been there long enough yet for
 > it to be any kind of real backward compatability issue.

I agree; cp -l shouldn't have been added.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: Marc Balmer

References:
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: Iain Hibbert
- cp -n diff
  - From: Zafer Aydoğan
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: cp -n diff
Next by Date: Re: cp -n diff
Previous by Thread: Re: cp -n diff
Next by Thread: Re: cp -n diff
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index