Re: cp -n diff

To: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: cp -n diff
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 11:22:10 -0400

On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:15:56AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:53:06AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>  > So, if -n is to be rejected from cp, which I think it should be, then
>  > -l should be removed as well, it hasn't been there long enough yet for
>  > it to be any kind of real backward compatability issue.
> 
> I agree; cp -l shouldn't have been added.

Agree.  I think I said so at the time, too.

Thor

References:
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: Iain Hibbert
- cp -n diff
  - From: Zafer Aydoğan
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: cp -n diff
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: cp -n diff
Next by Date: Re: cp -n diff
Previous by Thread: Re: cp -n diff
Next by Thread: Re: cp -n diff
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index