Re: cp -n diff

[Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost>]

Am 05.05.2011 um 10:15 schrieb David Holland 
<dholland-tech%NetBSD.org@localhost>:

> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 06:53:06AM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
>> So, if -n is to be rejected from cp, which I think it should be, then
>> -l should be removed as well, it hasn't been there long enough yet for
>> it to be any kind of real backward compatability issue.
> 
> I agree; cp -l shouldn't have been added.
> 

I fully agree and I am all for the removal of -l
Please before it makes it into a release....

> -- 
> David A. Holland
> dholland%netbsd.org@localhost