tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot

To: Steven Bellovin <smb%cs.columbia.edu@localhost>
Subject: Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
From: Roy Marples <roy%marples.name@localhost>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:13:53 +0100

On Wednesday 12 August 2009 04:22:24 Steven Bellovin wrote:
> The question is whether or not there's a lighter-weight intermediate
> solution for laptops than running a full caching named.

dnsmasq is much lighter than named in all respects and is as such ideal for 
the laptop where I use it always.

Thanks

Roy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
  - From: Arnaud Lacombe

References:
- Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
  - From: Alan Barrett
- Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
  - From: Steven Bellovin

Prev by Date: Re: definition of NULL correct?
Next by Date: Re: definition of NULL correct?
Previous by Thread: Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
Next by Thread: Re: Add a minimal instance of named early in the boot
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index