On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 10:58 -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > It's wrong to change the console entries. There should not be a getty > on /dev/console by default anyway, on ports without a separate 'console' > driver -- getty should be configured on all the usual suspects for > underlying console device. Are you saying that the existing tty for all ports is then wrong being configured for vt100? > So, on i386, for example, getty should be configured on tty00 with terminal > type 'unknown', and ttyE0 with terminal type 'wsvt25'. I'm only touching entries that match vt100 or vt220, which would be console, constty and ttyE* > If you don't do that, there's also no way to allow root to log in with a > password but require password entry to go single-user from boot. How can I test this? Thanks Roy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part