Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character

To: James Chacon <jmc%netbsd.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:18:36 +0000

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:43:37AM -0700, James Chacon wrote:
>>> I think we should warn.
>>
>> [...]
>
> I'm not necessarily apposed to warning, just that changing our existing 
> behavior of what to do with them should remain the same.

...ENOPARSE?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: James Chacon

References:
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: James Chacon
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: James Chacon
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: David Holland
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: Aleksey Cheusov
- Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
  - From: James Chacon

Prev by Date: Re: bsdcpio and bsdtar installed by default
Next by Date: Re: New postfix vs. /var
Previous by Thread: Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
Next by Thread: Re: bin/39002: harmful AWK extension: non-portable escaped character
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index