[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: obsoleting shlibs - what's the plan
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:09:50 -0400
Greg Troxel <gdt%ir.bbn.com@localhost> wrote:
> > >I don't understand. Which kind of problem arises?
> > When you use the new kerberos, then it is possible that the
> > old libraries won't interoperate because of missing features.
> >Is this any worse than using some other older computer that hasn't
> >been upgraded? Breaking everyone's compiled binaries seems
> The old libraries will only be linked by programs that do not use
> them. I fail to see how that is useful.
> What is useful is that programs that were compiled under older
> versions of the system on the same machine will continue to work,
> instead of the user being hosed and having to have a flag day rebuild
> of all sorts of programst that they might not even know depend on
> krb5. For example, I could no longer print. Fortunately I was able
> to figure it out nearly instantly because I understand this stuff.
> Why is it so important to nuke the old libraries, breaking programs
> compiled against them?
I agree with you.
But here's an idea for a pkgsrc tool: something that would look
in /bin/*, /sbin/*, /usr/*/*bin/*, /home/*/bin/*, etc., and identify
all unneeded shared libraries. A library is unneeded if (a) there's a
later version of it, and (b) nothing in any tested directory uses the
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Main Index |
Thread Index |