[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Mindaugas R. writes:
| For compatibility purposes we can rename it to cpu_set_t. Anyone see a
| potential problem with this?
I come back on this ...
I think that nobody raised an objection?
My problem is that ACE (http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html) does
not compile out of the box right now. The configure checks for the
pthread_setaffinity_np() function and if it finds it, it then wants to
call it with a cpu_set_t parameter.
Of course that's not NetBSD fault at all, but it would be nice if I
hadn't to make some specific patch just for that :)
Main Index |
Thread Index |