Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
From: Anthony Mallet <anthony.mallet%useless-ficus.net@localhost>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:54:21 +0100

Joerg Sonnenberger writes:
| On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 07:30:12PM +0100, Anthony Mallet wrote:
| > What is the correct type name? (from a POSIX p.o.v. I mean).
| 
| Neither. POSIX does not specify anything here.

Ah ok. What about using a Linux-compatible typedef then?
Since this is a new feature...

References:
- rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: David Holland
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: David Holland
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: David Holland
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: rpcgen with env variable CPP set to "cc -E"
  - From: Hubert Feyrer
- cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Next by Date: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Previous by Thread: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Next by Thread: Re: cpuset_t vs. cpu_set_t
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index